Why arent there any spoof lists?

[Yard-Row]

i think iv been paid-up member now for 3 months and have NEVER got the site i came here for [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] i realise now that there are cliques who just go for their regular sites and if no ones into Brazilians/Latinas&Mixed race i ain't gonna get passwords.

o2 broadband wireless connection wont let me use anonym proxies so haqings no option so i start ref-tar spoofs which is fun and easy but...where are the damn spoof lists around here???? passes would'nt die so quick if ppl spoofed you preserve the life of a pass.

there are ppl who are into "porn" and then there are ppl who just have a fascination with one site and don't need many sitepasses. Just a spoof for [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] would do me fine for life.

Spoof Lists please.

[Rhino]

Not all sites can be spoofed. It has to be a misconfiguration and a very sloppy admin/coder for that to be allowed.

Also consider the size of the sites in question. If a site has a small member base then the odds on it getting cracked are going to reduce somewhat. Some crackers run through a batch of their normal sites, then scan the requests section to see if anyone asked for any of them. Then, given time, they'll work on any outstanding sites for which they have the relevant genre of wordlist. Again, nothing guarantees a pass.

You mention that you can't use anonymous proxies to crack. Have you contributed any such proxies yourself for others to crack with to increase your chance of a cracker being able to work on your site?
(yes, programs are there for you to test and check proxies through your enforced ISP proxy).

[Yard-Row]

But spoofs have not just stopped working all over sudden some sites can and some wont, what harm is there in trying? it might work.

i was just suggesting ways to extend the life of passes that tend to die quick anyway, something i think everybody wants. whats the guarantee that posting proxies will get me the pass that i want? especially if the odds are low due to a smaller member base?

[Rhino]

Just wanting a spoof to work on a site doesn't mean that it wiill.

Ultimately, if you want guarantees, pay for the actual site.

[Yard-Row]

	Quote:			Originally Posted by Rhino
	Just wanting a spoof to work on a site doesn't mean that it wiill. Ultimately, if you want guarantees, pay for the actual site.

when i mentioned "guarantees" i wasn't asking for any, just bringing attention to the fact that you undermined your own argument.

And again what i said about spoof lists still stands . whats the harm in trying? using more aggressive techniques like [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] to find refs yields far greater results than guessing or following links clientside. its just a matter of sifting through to find whats what which is laborious.

[Rhino]

	Quote:			Originally Posted by Yard-Row
	when i mentioned "guarantees" i wasn't asking for any, just bringing attention to the fact that you undermined your own argument.

I said it would increase your chances, which it would. If a cracker doesn't have any anonymous proxies to test with, they're not going to go out on a limb for you.

	Quote:			Originally Posted by Yard-Row
	whats the harm in trying? using more aggressive techniques

Love to, but there's no guarantees it'd work you know

[Yard-Row]

Thanx

im @ uni so i dont always have time. thanx again

[market]

If you really want a site then you'll proably have to pay for gold and explain in your request how this is THE site you want. I've had Gold request passes that last for months.